dewoman81
05-26-2008, 08:29 PM
I have heard this statistic over and over... if you have a dog, cat, animal etc, then your child is less likely to have allergies. DF's family is using this to get me to keep his dog. I cant wrap my mind around this because I dont know the actual study, but here is my logic:
I am an allergy sufferer so I would not like to have pets. My child may or may not have allergies (probably will due to family history) but wont be exposed to pets because I cannot have them. I dont think the pets make a difference in the equation.
A parent without allergies is more likely to have a pet AND a child without allergies. This to me would explain the logic of the statistic. Anyone else have insight or more information about this so called study?
I am an allergy sufferer so I would not like to have pets. My child may or may not have allergies (probably will due to family history) but wont be exposed to pets because I cannot have them. I dont think the pets make a difference in the equation.
A parent without allergies is more likely to have a pet AND a child without allergies. This to me would explain the logic of the statistic. Anyone else have insight or more information about this so called study?