PDA

View Full Version : Cigarette Smoking and Breastfeeding


Megadodo
10-19-2007, 06:24 PM
Posted by creme.de.christine (Member # 2297) on March 15, 2004 06:56 PM March 15, 2004 06:56 PM :

First of all, a mom who can't stop smoking should breastfeed. Breastfeeding provides many immunities that help your baby fight illness and can even help counteract some of the effects of cigarette smoke on your baby: for example, breastfeeding has been shown to decrease the negative effects of cigarette smoke on a baby's lungs. It's definitely better if breastfeeding moms not smoke, but if you can't stop or cut down, then it is better to smoke and breastfeed than to smoke and formula feed.

The more cigarettes that you smoke, the greater the health risks for you and your baby. If you can't stop smoking, or don't want to stop smoking, it's safer for your baby if you cut down on the number of cigarettes that you smoke.
(from kellymom.com)

Follow these links to info on smoking and breastfeeding.

http://www.kellymom.com/health/lifestyle/smoking.html#babies

http://www.lalecheleague.org/FAQ/smoking.html

http://www.drjaygordon.com/links/BF/smoking.htm
LINK NOT WORKING

http://www.storknet.com/cubbies/breast/exjs16.htm

**********************
This site believes the women should be encouraged more strongly to quit smoking and includes a number of links indicating detrimental impact of smoking on breastfed babies.

http://whyquit.com/whyquit/LinksBirth.html
**********************

A Few Research Abstracts:

Maternal smoking and breastfeeding
F. Najdawi and M. Faouri
http://www.emro.who.int/Publications/EMHJ/0503/03.htm
ABSTRACT A 2-month study was undertaken to investigate the effects of maternal smoking on breastfeeding. A total of 500 mothers were interviewed twice postpartum and information about maternal smoking and sociodemographic factors was collected. After adjustment for maternal smoking and other confounders, results suggested that smoking had a direct effect on breastfeeding. The prevalence of breastfeeding reduced significantly among smokers but there was no significant reduction among non-smokers. Education and social class were related positively to continued breastfeeding but negatively to smoking. Because breastfeeding decreased with smoking, smoking should be discouraged, particularly in developing countries where breastfeeding constitutes an essential child survival measure.

**********************
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query...p;dopt=Abstract

Breastfeeding, maternal smoking and lower respiratory tract infections.

Nafstad P, Jaakkola JJ, Hagen JA, Botten G, Kongerud J.

Dept of Population Health Sciences, National Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.

The objective of the study was to assess the relationship between breastfeeding and lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) during the first year of life, with special reference to maternal smoking. A cohort of 3,754 children born in 1992-1993 in the City of Oslo, Norway was recruited and data were collected at birth, 6 and 12 months of age. Complete information was obtained from 3,238 children (follow-up rate 86%). The main outcome was an episode of a LRTI, such as pneumonia, bronchitis or bronchiolitis, based on a self-administered questionnaire addressed to parents when the child was 6 and 12 months old. The outcome was specified as physician-diagnosed. In logistic regression analysis adjusting for confounding, maternal smoking increased the risk of LRTIs in children breastfed for 0-6 months (odds ratio (AOR) 1.7; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.2-2.4), but not essentially when the child was breastfed for more than 6 months (AOR 1.1; 95% CI 0.7-1.6). Short-term breastfeeding (0-6 months) and no maternal smoking was related to an adjusted AOR of LRTIs of 1.3 (95% CI 1.0-1.7), and short-term breastfeeding combined with maternal smoking was related to an adjusted AOR of 2.2 (95% CI 1.6-3.1), as compared with long-term breastfeeding and no maternal smoking. The present study indicates a protective effect of long-term breastfeeding on the risk of lower respiratory tract infection during the first year of life. The results suggest that the protective effect is strongest in children exposed to environmental tobacco smoke.

*********************

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-05/bsj-bmc052703.php

Public release date: 28-May-2003
[ Print This Article | Close This Window ]

Contact: Emma Dickinson
pressoffice@bma.org.uk
44-207-383-6529
BMJ Specialty Journals

Breastfeeding may compensate for harmful effects of smoking during pregnancy
Breastfeeding may compensate for the harmful effects of smoking during pregnancy on a child's brain, suggests research in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.
The researchers based their findings on 570 only children from among over 3000 born at one Dutch hospital between 1975 and 1978. Details of the smoking habits of the mothers during pregnancy and the results of maths, spelling, and reading tests taken by the children at the age of 9 were analysed.

How the mothers chose to feed their children was also recorded on discharge from hospital and when their children were 9 and again when they were 25, to ensure that recall was reliable. Children who were breastfed for only a couple of weeks, or who were fed both breast and formula milk, were not included in the final analysis.

Only those children whose mothers had smoked during pregnancy and who had been bottle fed performed poorly on the school tests.

Mothers who breastfeed their children might differ from women who don't in some way that has not been accounted for, say the authors, in a bid to explain their findings. Or there may be some psychological aspects of breastfeeding that might influence a child's cognitive development, they suggest.
Posted by Gypsy (Member # 18) on May 15, 2004 10:36 PM May 15, 2004 10:36 PM :

Kids at risk even when parents smoke outside
Children still exposed to harmful chemicals, study finds

Updated: 2:33 p.m. ET April 05, 2004
STOCKHOLM, Sweden - Children of parents who smoke face double the risk of passive-smoking-related diseases than children of nonsmokers even if the smoking mom or dad lights up only outdoors, a Swedish study showed Monday.

advertisement

The World Health Organization regards environmental tobacco smoke exposure as a health hazard that affects almost half of the world€™s children.

€œThe results of this study indicates that smoking behavior in the home is of significance for children€™s ETS exposure,€ said a Linkoping University doctoral dissertation published in the April issue of the medical journal Pediatrics.

Researchers at the university in central Sweden said they had detected twice as high levels of cotinine -- a chemical created when the body processes nicotine -- in the urine of children whose parents smoked only outdoors with the door closed than for a control group of children with nonsmoking parents.

INTERACTIVE


€ Learn more about lung cancer


Since nicotine is highly specific for tobacco smoke, cotinine levels track exposure to tobacco smoke and its toxic constituents.

€œOne can speculate that it€™s from the smoker€™s breath but we have not studied this and we can€™t be sure,€ AnnaKarin Johansson, one of the researchers at Linkoping University€™s Faculty of Health Sciences, told Reuters by telephone.

For children of parents who varied their smoking between outdoors and by an open window, the exposure was 2.4 times higher, and for children in homes where parents smoked by the kitchen fan or outdoors it was more than three times higher.

In homes where parents regularly smoked indoors the exposure was 15 times higher than for children in the control group.

The study carried out from April 2001 to January 2003 analyzed urine samples from 366 children with at least one smoking parent and from 433 children of nonsmoking parents. All children were between 2.5 and 3 years old.

Copyright 2004 Reuters Limited. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Reuters content is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters

Crystal
10-21-2007, 11:18 PM
Straight Facts on smoking, pregnancy and breastfeeding:

http://whyquit.com/whyquit/LinksBirth.html

The number of web sites and articles that advise smoking mothers that the benefits of breastfeeding outweigh the risks posed by smoking is shocking. Most ignore the baby as a person who is subject to all other recent studies relating to nicotine addiction, nicotine's harms, smoking's other risks, including the risks posed by second-hand smoke. For example, if a mother abstained from smoking while pregnant, how long will it take to hook her new baby on nicotine if she returns to smoking while breastfeeding? A new study just released presents strong evidence that it may only take a few cigarettes a day for a few weeks to addict a full grown teenager. What evidence do we have to suggest that the outcome is any different for a small baby?

Included in the risks below are risks identified in other recent studies with at least one link to articles discussing each risk. Review each and decide for yourself whether or not they'd have application to a newborn. For example, if nicotine is believed to cause chronic depression, brain damage and learning impairment in new teen smokers, what evidence is there to suggest that feeding your baby nicotine via your milk wouldn't do the same? Although extremely difficult to develop any medical study to measure depression or intelligence in newborns, does that mean we should ignore such studies when it comes to breastfeeding?


Women who smoke while breastfeeding may
subject their baby to the risk of ...


* Addiction - 05/02
* Atherosclerosis - 07/01
* Middle ear infections - 02/02
* Less breast milk - 12/91 12/92
* Destruction of brain cells - 05/02
* Colic or excessive crying - 03/89
* Circulatory damage - 07/01 07/01
* Chronic Depression - 02/04 10/00
* Not being able to initiate breast feeding - 07/02
* Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) - 01/05 09/02 11/97
* Decrease in your child's ability to learn or memorize - 05/02
* Not wanting to initiate breast feeding due to smoking - 1999
* Growth of brain neurons to process nicotine - 05/02 03/02 11/95
* A reduction in the breast's ability to pass key nutrients to the infant - 07/04


Specific Breastfeeding Risk Reduction Findings


* Respiratory illness reduced 70% while breastfeeding - 09/90
* Allergy reaction risk reduced by breastfeeding - 05/96

Crystal
10-21-2007, 11:18 PM
1: J Epidemiol Community Health. 1990 Sep;44(3):224-30. Related Articles, Links (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2273361&dopt=Abstract)


Acute respiratory illness in Adelaide children: breast feeding modifies the effect of passive smoking.

Woodward A, Douglas RM, Graham NM, Miles H.

Department of Community Medicine, University of Adelaide, Australia.

STUDY OBJECTIVE--The aim was to investigate the relation between passive smoking and childhood acute respiratory illness. DESIGN--The study involved an initial postal survey on a random sample of children followed by a case-control study based on the survey. A respiratory illness score was calculated from maternal reports of episodes of illness in the previous 12 months. SETTING--The study was a population survey based on Adelaide metropolitan area in South Australia. PARTICIPANTS--The reference population (n = 13,996) was all live born children registered in South Australia in 1983 whose parents lived in Adelaide metropolitan area. Of these, 4985 families were contacted by post and from 2125 respondents, 1218 (58%) gave consent for home interview. "Cases" were children with respiratory illness scores in the top 20%, controlling for age and time of year (n = 258); "controls" were taken in the bottom 20% (n = 231). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Maternal smoking in the first year of life was associated with a doubling in relative odds of respiratory proneness in the child (odds ratio = 2.06, 95% CI 1.25-3.39) after adjustment for confounding by parental history of respiratory illness, other smokers in the home, use of group child care, parent's occupation, and levels of maternal stress and social support. There was no evidence that this association was attributable to differences in the way smoking and non-smoking parents perceived or managed childhood acute respiratory illness. Maternal smoking in the first year, without smoking in pregnancy, was also associated with increased risk of respiratory proneness (odds ratio 1.75, 95% CI 1.03-3.0), showing an effect of passive smoking independent of any in utero effect. There was a strong negative effect modification by breast feeding: relative odds of respiratory proneness with maternal smoking were seven times higher among children who were never breast fed than among those who were breast fed. CONCLUSIONS--The results suggest a relatively small but real effect of passive smoking on childhood acute respiratory illness. Effect modification by breast feeding may be due to a combination of behavioural and biological mechanisms.

PMID: 2273361 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]