That cute roundness and up-tilt to your
breasts evolved to help feed your baby, not attract your mate,
say evolutionists.

A study in the April 11th issue of "New Scientist"
magazine argues that that cute roundness and up-tilt of a woman's
breast evolved to prevent babies from smothering during breastfeeding,
and that their shape wasn't designed by evolution to attract
men. According to Gillian Bentley, a Royal Society research fellow at
University College in London, England, monkeys, with their jutting
jaws, can suckle their flat-chested mothers without suffocating, but
humans, whose faces are flatter, caused evolutionary pressure on
breast shape, making them rounder and fuller to allow human infants to
breathe while feeding, says the scientist.
"The idea came to me from breast feeding my own child when she
was an infant," says Bentley.
"If the human breast were flat
during lactation, which is true for our closest primate relatives,
human infants, with their flat faces, would suffocate."
Evolutionary biologists have long reflected on the reason for the
shape of the human breast.
Because breasts don't develop until
puberty, biologists have suggested that they helped early human
females attract a mate and keep him interested in her welfare and the
welfare of her children.
Those with larger breasts were more
successful, the theory goes, and therefore produced more offspring.
"My theory turns this around," Bentley says. "Humans
have flatter faces because of the evolution of a larger brain, which
necessitated a change in skull shape, as well as some changes in mouth
structure, the tongue, the muscles that support the tongue and the
length of the throat as language developed.
The whole idea is that
there was a co-evolution of the human flat face with breast shape, and
thus there was evolutionary pressure on the shape of the breast to
accommodate the infant."
On the other hand, if sexual selection is the reason for the larger
human breast, as many scientists have thought, why don't all cultures
eroticize the breast?
"It is true that in many cultures around the world, the breast
is not sexual," says Marilyn Yalom, author of A History of the
Breast and A History of the Wife.
"The breast is over-eroticized
in the Western world, but if you look at cultures in Africa, the
breast is for the baby, not for the male. It is the buttocks that have
become the erotic focal [there]."
The same is true in other cultures; for example, the Chinese make a
fetish of the foot, whereas the Japanese concentrated on the nape of
the neck.
Blame the male academics for the sexual selection theory, Bentley
says. "The majority of people who used the sexual selection
argument have been male and were part of Western culture with its
eroticized view of the breast."
But if sexual selection is not the reason for the shape of the
human breast, why does the breast respond sexually?
Bentley says, "It could be a combo here. The pressure for the
shape of the breast was initially from this need to feed the baby and
then, secondarily, men may have evolved to find the breast of this
shape and size more sexually interesting.
The convergence of the two
pressures could have evolved into more successfully reproducing
females."
|